THE ISSUE:Schools throughout the area opted not to air the president’s speech for their students.
OUR VIEW:The students missed hearing some good advice.
Somehow, politics got involved in President Barack Obama’s plan to deliver a speech to America’s students on Tuesday.
Critics apparently feared that Obama planned to use his speech as a bully pulpit. They wanted to know why he was taking his case directly to the kids. Shouldn’t he be making his arguments to adults?
Many school administrators responded by saying they would record the speech and decide later whether it was appropriate for their students.
The whole thing is a sad commentary on the current state of American politics.
Would critics have wanted to screen a speech to school kids by Franklin Delano Roosevelt? Ronald Reagan? George W. Bush? And if they had, would school administrators have listened?
We don’t all have to agree on policy issues. We might not even agree about everything the president might say in a speech to school kids.
But should the president’s staff really feel obligated to post his speech in advance so that the critics can be certain it doesn’t cross any lines?
The fact is the president’s speech was not much more than a pep talk. It was a call for students to take responsibility for their own education. Go to class and listen, the president said. Don’t let failures define you.
“We need every single one of you to develop your talents, skills and intellect so you can help solve our most difficult problems,” Obama said. “If you don’t do that — if you quit on school — you’re not just quitting on yourself, you’re quitting on your country.”
Obama made no reference to the uproar. Nor did he make an appeal for support for tough causes such as his health care overhaul. He used the talk to tell kids about his own youth and to urge them to set goals and work hard to achieve them.
Some school administrators said it was difficult to take time out of a busy school day to bring everyone together for a speech, and perhaps for them, the speech really would have been better on tape delay.
The president’s message, though, was clearly worth hearing.
“I expect great things from each of you,” the president told students. “So don’t let us down — don’t let your family or your country or yourself down. Make us all proud. I know you can do it.”
Where’s the controversy in that?
— Logansport Pharos-Tribune and Kokomo Tribune
Opinion
Politics get in way of worthy message
Schools throughout the area opted not to air the president’s speech for their students
- Opinion
-
-
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.
Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.
-
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.
Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.
-
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.
-
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.
-
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.
-
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’
The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:
“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.
-
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.
-
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.
Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.
-
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.
-
Heinig: ‘Right-to-work’ law to arouse continued resistance
I wouldn’t call Gov. Mitch Daniels a charismatic leader, but he does possess some leadership skills. If he didn’t, he couldn’t have brought us this far along the happy trail to his economic Valhalla.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
White shouldn’t return to office
White House Attacks Romney on Birth Control
Homs Bombardment Continues, Global Outcry Grows
Mo. Teen Gets Life Sentence for Killing Girl, 9
Lower-hassle Screening to Be Tested at Airports
Raw Video: Dog Rescued From Icy Colo. Water
Helmet Camera Captures Calif. Fire Rescue
Worker Tells 911: Powell 'exploded the House'
Triple Win: Santorum Takes Minn., Mo., Colo.
Injured Marine Inspired by Homecoming
No Rape Charges Against Son of NYPD Commissioner
Egypt's Ruling Generals Play Risky Game With US
Former Komen Exec Defends Funding Cut
Skip the Coffee Cup and Inhale Your Caffeine Fix
Calif. Gay Marriage Ban Ruled Unconstitutional
Jury Selection for Ex-UVa Athlete Enters 2nd Day
Cab Driver Helps Wis. Family Escape House Fire
Staff Removed at LA School During Abuse Probe
Runaway Goat Leads Police on Wild Chase
