THE ISSUE: A new way of evaluating schools.
OUR VIEW: Such an approach will be good for schools and students.
Gov. Mitch Daniels last week embraced the possibility of education reform that focuses on student achievement rather than forcing every student to meet a single standard.
That’s great news.
Local school administrators have been saying for some time that the current system fails to measure up to the federal goal of leaving no child behind. Instead, by focusing strictly on how many students pass the standardized test and how many fail, the current ratings encourage school corporations to focus primarily on those students just on the edge of passing the last round of tests.
The new approach would require schools to focus on every student. Schools would be rewarded for students who did better on the test, even if they fell short of passing. They would not be rewarded when students performed worse, even if they passed.
This approach makes sense, allowing schools to focus on encouraging every student to perform to the best of his or her ability.
This would eliminate the problem local schools encounter in teaching students with special needs. Those students now have their test performance judged using the same standards used for every other student.
The new approach will open up whole new horizons for Indiana schools. It will allow them to be judged based on what they’re supposed to be doing. Teaching.
They won’t be focused on just a few students at risk of failure. They’ll be focused on helping each and every child to achieve his or her potential.
Every child will have a chance at success. And what could be better than that?
Opinion
A needed change in school ratings
- Opinion
-
-
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.
Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.
-
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.
Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.
-
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.
-
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.
-
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.
-
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’
The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:
“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.
-
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.
-
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.
Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.
-
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.
-
Heinig: ‘Right-to-work’ law to arouse continued resistance
I wouldn’t call Gov. Mitch Daniels a charismatic leader, but he does possess some leadership skills. If he didn’t, he couldn’t have brought us this far along the happy trail to his economic Valhalla.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
White shouldn’t return to office








