The good news is that a bill aimed at reforming the way Indiana draws its legislative and congressional districts has cleared the Senate Elections Committee.
The bad news is that measures to establish a commission to oversee the process are still stuck in committee.
Some have suggested that with the budget issues facing the state and the limited time legislators have available in this year’s short session, it’s simply the wrong time to take on an issue like redistricting.
We disagree. The fact is that now is the perfect time to address this issue.
Every 10 years, legislators are required by law to draw new districts in line with the new population numbers produced by the census. That process will take place next year.
But the time to reform the process is this year, before lawmakers know which party will be in control of the Indiana House and Senate. If reform doesn’t happen now, it won’t happen this decade, and we’ll be stuck with this same broken process for another 10 years.
For too long, the main objective of the map-making process has been to create districts that will protect the interests of incumbents. Politics, rather than the public interest, has ruled the day.
As a result, we have districts that look more like snakes or dragons and an overwhelming number of legislative and congressional races with no real competition. In many cases, would-be challengers don’t even bother to file.
Senate Bill 80, authored by Republican Sen. Connie Lawson, calls for simple, compact districts that are respectful of neighborhoods, county lines and communities of interest.
The measure would go a long way toward putting the interests of voters ahead of the interests of politicians.
Critics of the reform effort point out that the state constitution expressly grants redistricting authority to the Indiana General Assembly.
That’s true, and it’s also true that the process of amending the constitution takes at least two years.
So, it’s too late to amend the constitution to take legislators completely out of the process, but it’s not too late to pass real reform.
Our hope is that at least Lawson’s bill will pass this session of the General Assembly, but in the long term, we hope lawmakers will push forward a constitutional amendment that would eliminate politics from the process entirely.
Opinion
Let’s reform redistricting
- Opinion
-
-
Cast a vote for centers
The issue: Vote centers in Howard County.
Our view: Centers are less expensive to operate and more convenient for the average voter.
-
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.
Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.
-
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.
Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.
-
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.
-
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.
-
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.
-
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’
The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:
“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.
-
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.
-
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.
Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.
-
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Cast a vote for centers








