A police officer stopped a night driver with an inoperative headlight. After the officer began chatting over the rolled-down window, he noticed a collection of knives in the back seat.
“What are those for?” demanded the policeman.
“Well, I have a knife-juggling act, and those are my knives.”
“I have my doubts,” replied the officer. “Let me see you juggle them.”
The man obliged. He exited his car and began juggling the knives alongside his auto.
Just then, two men drove by. One replied to the other, “I’m glad I gave up drinking. Those sobriety tests are getting rough!”
It’s not only sobriety test that are getting rough – our city’s officials have some humdinger challenges awaiting them. We can label our situation, “monumental.”
The other evening, I was viewing the City Council meeting (recorded from a session in late July) on KGOV-TV. The focus of discussion was our city’s financial crisis. Mike Karickhoff explained our monetary plight with great clarity.
The fact that the “old” Chrysler will not pay approximately $6 million worth of taxes this year – and another $6 million next year – has put the squeeze on our finances. This was money we were depending upon. The Chrysler shortfall is in addition to lost revenues (due to reduced property tax rates) of more than $2 million – and a lower-than-anticipated collection rate of residential property taxes.
The implications of this shortfall are sobering: Our city no longer has the money we thought we had. Drastically reducing city payrolls and expenditures means real human beings (and their families) will suffer the painful consequences. Being laid off in Kokomo (we recently led the nation in unemployment and have been labeled as “America’s fastest dying city”) is no pipe dream. Even “McJobs” are scarce.
I do not think our elected officials ran for office expecting to don a black cape and top hat, sport a handlebar mustache, and play the role of the villain landlord – evicting poor Nell and her widow mother. Making cuts to city expenditures is a comparable dirty job – yet someone has to do it. And (no matter what our leaders decide), many of us will question whether they made the appropriate cuts. Especially if they hit close to home.
Even if the city borrows money from the state, that money will have to be repaid by making future financial slashes. A loan will not be adequate to maintain the status quo, even in the short term. Our city leaders do not have a solitary good choice; they are scurrying about, seeking the “least worst” choice. It’s not about the greatest good, but the least bad. But everything is not bad.
We can strain beyond the gloom to view some positives about our long-term future. First, our mayor and our council seem to be working together for the common good of our community. Ego and partisanship tend to “check out” when serious problems “check in.” Such teamwork bodes well for our future. If our city is to prosper, we need to maintain a united team.
Second, Chrysler has survived as a new corporation in alliance with Fiat. The long-term future could be much brighter on the Chrysler front. In a couple of years, tax money could roll in.
Third, $89 million in stimulus are destined for local Delphi operations. If Delphi is successful in developing electric-car technology, Kokomo’s best days will probably be ahead!
Fourth, the City of Firsts offers a quality of life that is to be reckoned with. Community events, pretty streets, bountiful parks and a strong commitment to develop our economic base give Kokomo a competitive edge.
Fifth, if annexation attempts are successful, Kokomo could improve its tax base and lessen reductions of city employees. I am neither endorsing nor opposing annexation in this article, just commenting on its potential effect upon Kokomo.
People of faith need to remember our mayor and our council members in our prayers. All of us need to consider what it would be like to be in their shoes. Times are rough.
• Ed Vasicek is pastor of Highland Park Church and a weekly contributor to the Kokomo Tribune.
Opinion
VASICEK: A rough, painful job
- Opinion
-
-
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.
Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.
-
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.
Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.
-
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.
-
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.
-
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.
-
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’
The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:
“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.
-
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.
-
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.
Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.
-
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.
-
Heinig: ‘Right-to-work’ law to arouse continued resistance
I wouldn’t call Gov. Mitch Daniels a charismatic leader, but he does possess some leadership skills. If he didn’t, he couldn’t have brought us this far along the happy trail to his economic Valhalla.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
White shouldn’t return to office








