Gun permit debate should stick to facts

Opinion

Discussion

January 19, 2010

Anonymous The Kokomo Tribune Tue Jan 19, 2010, 10:03 PM EST

THE ISSUE:Indiana lawmakers are considering four bills that would restrict access to gun permit records.

OUR VIEW:Proponents of the restrictions are using exaggerations to make their case.

Those seeking to cut off access to information about gun permits are using misinformation to make their case.

They have suggested that two newspapers published the names and addresses of gun permit holders. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The Indianapolis Star and the Bloomington Herald-Times used the information to create searchable databases on their Web sites.

Organizations such as the National Rifle Association claim the databases violated the privacy of gun owners. One lawmaker suggested that the Herald-Times database represented a virtual catalog for people in the market to steal guns.

That’s a bit of an overstatement.

The Star’s database allowed readers to learn the number of gun permits in a given ZIP code. The Herald-Times allowed them to find out the number of gun permits on a particular street.

Neither identified specific gun owners.

Having access to such information does more than just satisfy a reader’s curiosity about how many neighbors have gun permits. It might also show a trend about where state police are issuing gun permits and where they aren’t.

Are residents of some neighborhoods being denied permits unfairly? The only way to find out is to make the addresses of permit holders public.

But why should the public be entitled to know the names of permit holders?

Here’s one reason.

The Indianapolis Star used that information to show that more than 100 people had been issued gun permits even though local police had recommended against it.

These were people police considered likely to violate the law and yet they had been granted gun permits.

Shouldn’t the public know that?

And what about the employer who recently fired a disgruntled employee? Shouldn’t that employer be able to discover the former worker now has a permit to carry a gun?

Public access supporters point out that gun rights advocates might be working against their own interests by shutting down access to these records.

How, for example, will they be able to prove that law-abiding citizens are wrongly being denied these permits if they cut off access to the information?

It’s certainly worth debating whether this information should be accessible to the public. Opponents might be able to put together a compelling case, but they should not rely on distortions to do so.

Both sides should make their best arguments. But they should stick to the facts.

— Logansport Pharos-Tribune, Kokomo Tribune

Text Only | Photo Reprints

Opinion

Cast a vote for centers
The issue: Vote centers in Howard County.

Our view: Centers are less expensive to operate and more convenient for the average voter.

February 9, 2012
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.

Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.

February 9, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.

Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.

February 8, 2012
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.

February 8, 2012
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.

February 6, 2012 1 Photo
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.

February 5, 2012
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’

The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:

“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.

February 3, 2012
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.

February 3, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.

Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.

February 2, 2012
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.

February 2, 2012
More Opinion Headlines

Opinion

Search Results

Discussion

Gun permit debate should stick to facts

Site Map

Contact Us