Because it matters

Opinion

Discussion

January 9, 2010

Anonymous The Kokomo Tribune Sat Jan 09, 2010, 06:34 PM EST

A few apologists for the Indiana General Assembly – and there really aren’t many left these days – have asked why the Kokomo Tribune and 22 other Indiana newspapers have made such a fuss over lawmakers’ acceptance of gifts from lobbyists.

Is there evidence, the gist of the argument goes, that any legislator has traded votes in exchange for a trip to the Caribbean, seats at a Colts game or dinner at The Capital Grille? The short answer is no; this isn’t a matter of outright vote buying.

But the more complete answer is this: The gifts. Lobbyists, paid to represent giant corporations and other special interests, plead their clients’ case over dinner or during halftime. Ordinary Hoosiers, who are without the means to entertain their elected leaders in such a manner, are left out of the discussion.

After years of refusing to address ethics reform, legislative leaders appear ready to finally adopt higher standards, at least in some measure.

The question now is whether those reforms will rise to a level that makes a lasting difference.

These three measures under consideration would be marked improvements from the status quo: adoption of a one-year cooling-off period before legislators can start work as lobbyists; requiring universities to report lobbying expenses; and blocking legislators from accepting campaign contributions and other handouts from state contractors.

However, another reform pushed by House Speaker Pat Bauer, lowering the reporting threshold for gifts from $100 to $50, would be only a modest step forward. The better move would be to bar legislators from accepting any gift worth more than $50. It’s a step that would end the most outrageous abuses of power.

Why does it matter? It’s about blocking the special access that special interests buy for themselves. It’s about ensuring that elected leaders don’t think they owe their benefactors anything beyond the ordinary. It’s about the public’s right to a state government that meets the highest ethical standards.

Text Only | Photo Reprints

Opinion

Cast a vote for centers
The issue: Vote centers in Howard County.

Our view: Centers are less expensive to operate and more convenient for the average voter.

February 9, 2012
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.

Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.

February 9, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.

Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.

February 8, 2012
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.

February 8, 2012
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.

February 6, 2012 1 Photo
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.

February 5, 2012
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’

The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:

“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.

February 3, 2012
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.

February 3, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.

Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.

February 2, 2012
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.

February 2, 2012
More Opinion Headlines

Opinion

Search Results

Discussion

Because it matters

Site Map

Contact Us