County must reduce costs

Opinion

Discussion

August 26, 2009

Anonymous The Kokomo Tribune Wed Aug 26, 2009, 09:43 PM EDT

THE ISSUE: County government budget talks.

OUR VIEW: However unpalatable, the council must cut its work force.

County governments, municipalities and school corporations across the state currently are cobbling together fiscal plans for 2010. And they’re in the grip of a powerful vise.

At one end, the Statehouse’s property tax caps are reducing tax collections. At the other, a deep, 20-month recession is diminishing real estate values and escalating home foreclosures.

It’s a pretty tight squeeze.

But nowhere in Indiana is financing government more difficult than in Kokomo and Howard County. Compounding an already abysmal fiscal forecast, the former Chrysler LLC is refusing to pay personal property taxes for 2009 and 2010, which would result in lost revenue of up to $4 million to county government alone.

Laurie Martin, chief deputy to the Howard County auditor, said Monday that if the county council approves a requested $19.5 million budget, “we will have a zero operating balance.”

The Howard County Council this week is reviewing budget requests from each county department. Sheriff Marty Talbert asked councilmen Wednesday to consider across-the-board pay cuts of 5 percent in lieu of layoffs. He said he needs every employee he has.

Councilman Paul Wyman noted later that would amount to a $400,000 savings to the county – significant, but not nearly enough.

However unpalatable, the council must cut its work force of 596. It must reduce the number of paid holidays, which could be as many as 16 in 2010. It must require its employees to contribute a portion of their Public Employee Retirement Fund payments; currently, the county pays the entire amount for each of its workers. It must stop paying employees while they’re at lunch.

The vise won’t loosen its grip any time soon.

Text Only | Photo Reprints

Opinion

White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.

Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.

February 9, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.

Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.

February 8, 2012
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.

February 8, 2012
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.

February 6, 2012 1 Photo
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.

February 5, 2012
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’

The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:

“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.

February 3, 2012
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.

February 3, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.

Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.

February 2, 2012
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.

February 2, 2012
Heinig: ‘Right-to-work’ law to arouse continued resistance
I wouldn’t call Gov. Mitch Daniels a charismatic leader, but he does possess some leadership skills. If he didn’t, he couldn’t have brought us this far along the happy trail to his economic Valhalla.

February 2, 2012
More Opinion Headlines

Opinion

Search Results

Discussion

County must reduce costs

Site Map

Contact Us