Where do we go from here?

Opinion

Discussion

September 3, 2009

Anonymous The Kokomo Tribune Thu Sep 03, 2009, 10:16 PM EDT

Summer recess is almost over and Congress will return next week to Washington, D.C.

For sure, many of our lawmakers have heard an earful of ideas on health care reform. It is now time for them to get down to the hard business of compromise. That is what democracy does best, and when our government governs from the “middle” revealed in compromise, it governs best for all Americans.

Supporters on the extremes of each side will not budge very much. Government insurance for all the “poor” no matter the cost or status quo, with no real change, will dominate on the wings. Somewhere, and we are not sure where it is, there is a middle ground.

No doubt the thousand-page proposal generated by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and others, which no one appears to have read, will be a starting point for the Democrats.

The Republicans need to write their own position to counter. Both proposals should be far less than 1,000 pages and be readable and understandable by all, most of all by the public. We should be able to read it and decide for ourselves.

Each proposal should come with a firm dollar cost to the federal treasury. No gimmicks, no voodoo mathematics. Just tell us what it will cost each year for the next 10 years. One number will probably be high, and the other lower.

Then put the two proposals on the table for debate. That is the way compromise is achieved. Debate it, modify it, move it around, consider costs and benefits, and do it all with absolute transparency. It may take a while, as compromise usually does.

Then produce a compromise bill, along with the total cost to the taxpayer.

Here is the clincher: Find cuts in other government programs (nothing is “off the table” or “off budget”) to pay for a revenue-neutral proposal. We implement the reform that we can afford and move on.

That is what our lawmakers are elected and paid to do — govern in the best interests of all Americans. Compromise has always pointed that direction in the past. Let’s do it NOW.

— The Joplin (Mo.) Globe

Text Only | Photo Reprints

Opinion

White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.

Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.

February 9, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.

Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.

February 8, 2012
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.

February 8, 2012
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.

February 6, 2012 1 Photo
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.

February 5, 2012
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’

The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:

“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.

February 3, 2012
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.

February 3, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.

Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.

February 2, 2012
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.

February 2, 2012
Heinig: ‘Right-to-work’ law to arouse continued resistance
I wouldn’t call Gov. Mitch Daniels a charismatic leader, but he does possess some leadership skills. If he didn’t, he couldn’t have brought us this far along the happy trail to his economic Valhalla.

February 2, 2012
More Opinion Headlines

Opinion

Search Results

Discussion

Where do we go from here?

Site Map

Contact Us