WYMAN: With annexation, let’s study Unigov

Opinion

Discussion

May 8, 2008

One government can serve county

Anonymous The Kokomo Tribune Thu May 08, 2008, 10:01 PM EDT

To say the least, there has been a tremendous amount of discussion about annexation since the mayor announced his proposal. As a county councilman, I have had many conversations and e-mails regarding it. To be expected, there are people on all sides of the issue.

Let me first say, there are many parts of the annexation proposal that make complete sense. It almost makes you wonder how it ended up taking this long to make those situations right. There are literally pockets within the city limits that are completely surrounded by city boundaries, but yet reside in the county. The mayor should be commended for making those areas consistent with their incorporated neighbors.

There is also merit to growing the city of Kokomo’s population to more than 50,000 residents. It seems that opens Kokomo up for additional funding at the federal level and reclassifies our city. That could be very beneficial from an economic growth perspective.

There are some areas that I am not sure make sense to annex. Some seem too rural; some seem too costly to extend city utilities and infrastructure. With a proposal of this nature, we will have to wait and see the numbers and cost to taxpayers. The city will present its annexation financial plan on May 12. As the public hearings commence, I think there is a bigger fish to fry than annexation. The answer is simple to me – Unigov.

I have been discussing this over the past year, some in guest columns, some in speeches, and some with other elected officials. It has been a slow ball to get rolling, but every time I talk about it publicly, residents flood me with calls and e-mails saying, yes, this is the way to go. Here is why I think now is the right time.

The City of Kokomo has stated under the new property tax system it will be losing about $2 million in revenue by 2010, and it appears the county will lose revenue, as well. I would suggest that getting rid of duplications in services between city and county government could make up that short fall and more! This would eliminate the possibility of anyone’s taxes being increased to make up the difference.

Here is the bottom line: If the current annexation plan goes through, and 14,000 more people are incorporated into the city, that will mean 71 percent of the Howard County populations will be in the Kokomo city limits. If you take out the incorporated towns of Russiaville and Greentown, do we really need two, full-blown governments with only one servicing less than a quarter of the population? The good news is there is already a law in place that allows local governments to consolidate, as I am suggesting. The same old government system needs to be revamped. It is outdated, period! We always hear how government is short of money. It’s time to get rid of the expensive, unnecessary duplications.

Yes, I am suggesting smaller government. I am suggesting a new way of doing business, and I am suggesting tackling a project that will require a tremendous amount of work and due diligence. We should immediately begin a study to see of Unigov is right for Howard County.

If the study comes back and says it’s not right – great. However, it is my belief that a county our size – 85,000 people – can operate with one very effective and efficient government. In order to compete going forward, we must look at new ways of doing business as a community.

As always, I love to hear from you. Please e-mail me your thoughts on this subject to pwyman8@aol.com. With the appropriate amount of support, we can begin the study.

Paul Wyman is a county

councilman and owner of

The Wyman Group reality firm.

Text Only | Photo Reprints

Opinion

Cast a vote for centers
The issue: Vote centers in Howard County.

Our view: Centers are less expensive to operate and more convenient for the average voter.

February 9, 2012
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.

Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.

February 9, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.

Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.

February 8, 2012
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.

February 8, 2012
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.

February 6, 2012 1 Photo
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.

February 5, 2012
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’

The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:

“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.

February 3, 2012
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.

February 3, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.

Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.

February 2, 2012
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.

February 2, 2012
More Opinion Headlines

Opinion

Search Results

Discussion

WYMAN: With annexation, let’s study Unigov

One government can serve county

Site Map

Contact Us