THE ISSUE:Child-support delinquencies
OUR VIEW:We support a new state initiative to suspend the driver’s licenses of non-paying parents.
Back in April, Howard Circuit Court Judge Lynn Murray and County Prosecutor James Fleming asked the County Council’s approval to increase the workload of the Circuit Court juvenile referee.
The number of paternity and Child in Need of Services (CHINS) cases had tripled in the first quarter of this year, Murray said. Those cases were taking up much more of her time.
“We have 500 to 600 paternity cases – an important part of that is child support,” she told council members.
The judge said she was spending four hours every Monday to hear up to 60 cases involving enforcement of child-support orders. Such a caseload apparently isn’t unique to Howard County, and the state soon will do something about that.
Parents who owe $25,000 or more in child support and who haven’t contributed money toward the care of their children for at least a year could have their driver’s licenses suspended, Gov. Mitch Daniels said Monday. The new initiative also includes fishing and hunting licenses.
“We don’t want to take anybody’s license ... but if you won’t do your duty, then certain privileges the state confers ought not be yours until you start doing your duty,” he said.
The new program will launch in Indiana’s four most-populace counties – Marion, Lake, Allen and St. Joseph – as well as Vanderburgh, Tippecanoe, Monroe and Kosciusko. Daniels said the rest of the state will be added soon.
What’s more, the $25,000 starting point later will be lowered to just $2,000, and from one year of delinquency to just three months. The Department of Child Services believes more than 76,000 cases of nonpayment in Indiana meet the $2,000 cutoff.
We applaud the state in getting tough on payment of child support. Such cases clog our courts while children needlessly suffer.
We expect many delinquent parents to pay up out of fear of losing their driving privileges.
Opinion
Pay up or lose your licenses
- Opinion
-
-
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.
Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.
-
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.
Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.
-
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.
-
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.
-
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.
-
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’
The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:
“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.
-
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.
-
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.
Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.
-
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.
-
Heinig: ‘Right-to-work’ law to arouse continued resistance
I wouldn’t call Gov. Mitch Daniels a charismatic leader, but he does possess some leadership skills. If he didn’t, he couldn’t have brought us this far along the happy trail to his economic Valhalla.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
White shouldn’t return to office








