THE ISSUE:Galveston code enforcement.
OUR VIEW:This is an issue town board members were elected to address.
Galveston officials should be lining up behind a group of local residents campaigning to clean up their town.
For the second month in a row, members of a citizens group appeared before the town board this week to ask for the enforcement of local ordinances concerning unsafe structures and junk. They are particularly concerned about junk that has accumulated on property owned by one of the members of the town board.
Come on, folks, this isn’t complicated.
One of the primary functions of local government is to establish rules by which residents of a community agree to live and then to enforce those rules. Agreeing to follow those rules is the price of living in civilized society.
It is patently absurd to argue that what happens on private property is no one’s business but that of the property owner. Neighbors have a clear stake in what’s happening next door.
Properties strewn with junk are eyesores that reflect badly on the entire community. They can drive down the value of every house on the block.
They can also create a hazard to the public health, providing a habitat for rats and other vermin.
And in this case, residents are complaining about junk that they say is not only scattered on private property, it’s spilling over onto the sidewalk.
These are the sorts of issues that town board members were elected to address.
Folks who invest their hard-earned money in a home in Galveston have a right to expect their elected representatives will look out for their interests, and if those representatives fail in their obligation, local voters should not hesitate to vote them out of office.
Of course, they won’t get a chance to do that for more than two years. The next municipal election is scheduled for 2011.
But they can do what the First Amendment expressly allows them to do. They can petition their government for a redress of grievances. And they can keep at it until somebody finally takes action.
– Pharos-Tribune, Logansport, and Kokomo Tribune
Opinion
Galveston board should take action
- Opinion
-
-
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.
Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.
-
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.
Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.
-
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.
-
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.
-
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.
-
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’
The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:
“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.
-
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.
-
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.
Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.
-
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.
-
Heinig: ‘Right-to-work’ law to arouse continued resistance
I wouldn’t call Gov. Mitch Daniels a charismatic leader, but he does possess some leadership skills. If he didn’t, he couldn’t have brought us this far along the happy trail to his economic Valhalla.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
White shouldn’t return to office








