THE ISSUE:Plans to renovate the downtown library, and build a pre-engineered structure at the South Branch.
OUR VIEW:Library board has a capital plan that will improve the Main Branch without raising taxes.
“If someone had told me in 2005, when I took office of president of the library board, that we still wouldn’t have a library built by the end of my presidency in 2006,” began a column we published by Susan Luttrell, “I would have laughed at their foolishness.”
Luttrell isn’t laughing. But in the five years since the Kokomo-Howard County Public Library announced plans to build a new, 89,000-square-foot Main Library, its board hasn’t sat still.
In 2007, architect and library consultant Mike Montgomery presented the board a new needs assessment for the library system. He advised the board expand the Russiaville and South branches, and scale back its downtown building plans to 58,000 square feet.
Statistics supported Montgomery’s advice. Between 2002 and 2007, foot traffic had increased 54 percent at the South Branch, 32 percent at Russiaville and 6 percent at the Main Library downtown.
But state officials stopped the board’s plan to build a $6 million expansion to the South Branch. The board sought authority to sell $2 million in bonds, which would have increased property taxes. The state rejected the request.
Last December, board members approved plans to use their existing capital funds to expand public areas in the downtown library, build a pre-engineered structure at the South Branch, move the bookmobile and collection management services into the new, $1 million building on the south side and purchase a new, $229,000 bookmobile.
Some community leaders weren’t thrilled with the board’s action. They likely weren’t happy with the board’s vote Monday to continue what it started in December.
The library board has been more than patient with those leaders and their competing plans for a downtown library and, possibly, a new YMCA. But the board now has a capital plan that will renovate the downtown facility without raising taxes.
Besides, reworking the Main Branch might attract the kind of foot traffic the South Branch has seen. If that happens, everyone wins: library patrons and taxpayers.
Opinion
Board right to move on
- Opinion
-
-
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.
Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.
-
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.
Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.
-
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.
-
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.
-
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.
-
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’
The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:
“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.
-
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.
-
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.
Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.
-
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.
-
Heinig: ‘Right-to-work’ law to arouse continued resistance
I wouldn’t call Gov. Mitch Daniels a charismatic leader, but he does possess some leadership skills. If he didn’t, he couldn’t have brought us this far along the happy trail to his economic Valhalla.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
White shouldn’t return to office








