Lift up, inspire, Mr. President

Opinion

Discussion

May 11, 2009

Anonymous The Kokomo Tribune Mon May 11, 2009, 10:09 PM EDT

THE ISSUE:President Obama’s Notre Dame commencement address.

OUR VIEW:President’s visit shouldn’t be to debate social policy.

Reader Pat Weaver of Galveston sent us a letter that demands your attention – not to mention that of President Obama and, in particular, the many opponents and supporters of this country’s abortion laws who plan to voice their opinions at the University of Notre Dame’s graduation ceremonies Saturday.

“With all the controversy over President Obama speaking at Notre Dame’s commencement, why doesn’t he just politely bow out?” Weaver wrote. “There was already one demonstration last weekend. Imagine what it is going to be like on graduation day!

“The Catholic hierarchy is against it. Over 300,000 people, so far, are against it. This could ruin an otherwise joyous day for all concerned.

“I can understand the students wanting him to appear. Everyone wants to meet the president, no matter what their politics. But for many other reasons, he should just bow out!” Weaver concludes.

Since the president accepted the school’s invitation to give this year’s commencement address, many Catholics have condemned the administration for the overture. They’re angry Obama supports abortion rights and embryonic stem cell research. Archbishop Raymond Burke, the first American to head the Vatican supreme court, called Notre Dame’s offer to address its graduates “a scandal.”

The president’s visit to this country’s most identifiable Catholic university shouldn’t be to debate social policy. It should be to congratulate its graduates, encourage them to volunteer in their communities and lift up those in the social and economic margins.

It should be to inspire them to practice the teachings of Jesus.

It’s our hope that, as years pass, Notre Dame’s Class of 2009 proudly remembers the president attended their commencement – not that his presence intruded upon the celebrations of their classmates, friends and families.

Text Only | Photo Reprints

Opinion

White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.

Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.

February 9, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.

Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.

February 8, 2012
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.

February 8, 2012
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.

February 6, 2012 1 Photo
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.

February 5, 2012
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’

The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:

“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.

February 3, 2012
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.

February 3, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.

Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.

February 2, 2012
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.

February 2, 2012
Heinig: ‘Right-to-work’ law to arouse continued resistance
I wouldn’t call Gov. Mitch Daniels a charismatic leader, but he does possess some leadership skills. If he didn’t, he couldn’t have brought us this far along the happy trail to his economic Valhalla.

February 2, 2012
More Opinion Headlines

Opinion

Search Results

Discussion

Lift up, inspire, Mr. President

Site Map

Contact Us