We were disappointed that Gov. Mitch Daniels vetoed what Indiana Secretary of State Todd Rokita described as the one local government reform to make its way through the Indiana General Assembly.
Senate Bill 209 would have allowed counties throughout the state to have elections using the vote center concept that Cass County adopted last year.
Opponents objected to the measure, not because of the vote centers but because of other provisions. One was the repeal of a requirement that bipartisan election boards vote unanimously on satellite early voting locations. The other was a provision allowing voters to cast absentee ballots without an excuse.
We understand the concern about a bipartisan election process. Any measure that would allow one party to ignore concerns of the other in managing an election should be cause for concern.
We’re less sympathetic to opponents’ objections to no-excuse absentee voting.
Making it easier for Hoosiers to vote should be everyone’s goal.
For years, voters across the state have been limited to casting ballots at a single polling place during one 12-hour period. Vote centers allow them to cast ballots over several days at any of a number of locations throughout the county.
The whole idea is to give voters the chance to vote at a location that fits best into their schedules. They might choose a site near home, or they might choose one near the office. Heck, they might even swing by a vote center during a weekly trip to the grocery store.
The idea is to take voting to the voters, and it’s a concept whose time has come.
With local government under increasing pressure to trim expenses, moving to vote centers seems to us to be a no-brainer. By cutting down on the number of polling sites, the concept allows counties to save money by operating their elections with less voting equipment and fewer poll workers.
At the same time, the centers make it easier for everyone to vote.
This is one of those rare scenarios in which everybody wins.
Rokita has expressed the hope that lawmakers will incorporate the concept into the budget measure they will be considering during a special session next month.
We join in that hope.
Opinion
Concept whose time has come
- Opinion
-
-
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.
Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.
-
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.
Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.
-
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.
-
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.
-
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.
-
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’
The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:
“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.
-
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.
-
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.
Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.
-
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.
-
Heinig: ‘Right-to-work’ law to arouse continued resistance
I wouldn’t call Gov. Mitch Daniels a charismatic leader, but he does possess some leadership skills. If he didn’t, he couldn’t have brought us this far along the happy trail to his economic Valhalla.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
White shouldn’t return to office








