The blindfold vs. the balance

Opinion

Discussion

June 9, 2009

Anonymous The Kokomo Tribune Tue Jun 09, 2009, 05:46 PM EDT

State Treasurer Richard Mourdock wants to remind America that Lady Justice wears a blindfold.

He, Sen. Jim Buck of Kokomo and like-minded conservatives have a problem with Chrysler LLC’s sale to Fiat SpA.

They believe President Obama and his automotive task force sidestepped the Constitution – that any reorganization plan must first be approved by creditors. They believe the administration is using Troubled Asset Relief Program funds illegally in the Chrysler bailout. They believe that Fiat and the United Auto Workers are getting more out of Chrysler’s bankruptcy than secured creditors.

They believe our courts are giving the administration preferential treatment, and creditors the shaft.

We want to remind ideologues such as Mourdock that Lady Justice also holds a measuring balance.

Mourdock is fighting Chrysler’s sale on behalf of three state funds that own loans to the nation’s third-largest automaker. Those loans have a face value of $42 million. Indiana bought the loans in the secondary market for $17 million. The state would receive $12.2 million in Chrysler’s sale to Fiat, Chrysler said.

If successful, however, Mourdock’s arguments could lead to a Chrysler liquidation. Rep. Joe Donnelly, D-Ind., has said if that occurred, secured creditors such as the Indiana pension funds would receive a zero-to-18 percent return on investment.

We doubt State Troopers and retired teachers would consider liquidation financially responsible on Mourdock’s part.

Furthermore, it would result in the loss of 38,500 Chrysler jobs – about 6,000 in Kokomo alone. Liquidation would decimate the benefits of tens of thousands of Chrysler retirees, exacerbate the already-tenuous finances of its parts suppliers, and lead to the loss of thousands of auto-related jobs across the nation.

Such economic pain would not affect just Chrysler towns such as Kokomo. It would be nationwide.

According to Chrysler, Mourdock is being offered 71.8 percent of the actual value of pension-fund holdings. If he truly takes his “oath of office and fiduciary responsibilities very, very seriously,” as he said in a letter to the editor we published May 26, he’ll drop his case against the Chrysler sale.

Text Only | Photo Reprints

Opinion

White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.

Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.

February 9, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.

Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.

February 8, 2012
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.

February 8, 2012
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.

February 6, 2012 1 Photo
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.

February 5, 2012
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’

The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:

“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.

February 3, 2012
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.

February 3, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.

Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.

February 2, 2012
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.

February 2, 2012
Heinig: ‘Right-to-work’ law to arouse continued resistance
I wouldn’t call Gov. Mitch Daniels a charismatic leader, but he does possess some leadership skills. If he didn’t, he couldn’t have brought us this far along the happy trail to his economic Valhalla.

February 2, 2012
More Opinion Headlines

Opinion

Search Results

Discussion

The blindfold vs. the balance

Site Map

Contact Us