When courts get involved

Opinion

Discussion

June 10, 2009

Anonymous The Kokomo Tribune Wed Jun 10, 2009, 05:00 PM EDT

A 13-year-old cancer patient underwent chemotherapy in Minnesota last month in spite of his family’s objections.

The young man’s parents said they were supporting their son’s decision to refuse medical treatment for religious reasons. They had said they would give chemotherapy a try, but they stopped after a single treatment when the chemicals made the boy sick.

Courts have been consistent in their rulings regarding the rights of children to medical care. Judges have ruled that even though adults might have the right to refuse such care on religious grounds, they do not have the right to deny that care to their children.

The California Supreme Court, for example, ruled that a mother could be prosecuted for involuntary manslaughter when her child died of meningitis. She had sought to heal the child through prayer, but prosecutors argued she should have sought medical treatment. The court made the ruling even though California law specifically exempts treatment by spiritual means from the definition of child neglect.

In the Minnesota case, the teenager’s mother took her son on a cross-country journey in an effort to protect him from a medical procedure she did not believe would make him well. She came home after her husband issued a public appeal and authorities promised she would face no criminal charges.

Physicians say the boy has a 90 percent chance of survival with chemotherapy. Without it, they say, his chances would have been 5 percent.

Perhaps most of us agree with the judges in finding that the parents in these cases are wrong. Children are too young to decide for themselves, and they should not be allowed to die simply because their parents are too stubborn to allow medical science to work its wonders.

It’s a compelling argument.

Placing ourselves in the shoes of these parents, we might have chosen differently. Perhaps we would throw everything we could find at the disease. Trying both prayer and medical science, both the traditional and the experimental.

Still, we are left to ponder how we would react if the roles here were reversed. What if the folks who question medical science were in the majority? Would we be willing to have their judgment imposed on us?

– Pharos-Tribune, Logansport, and Kokomo Tribune

Text Only | Photo Reprints

Opinion

White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.

Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.

February 9, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.

Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.

February 8, 2012
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.

February 8, 2012
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.

February 6, 2012 1 Photo
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.

February 5, 2012
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’

The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:

“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.

February 3, 2012
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.

February 3, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.

Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.

February 2, 2012
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.

February 2, 2012
Heinig: ‘Right-to-work’ law to arouse continued resistance
I wouldn’t call Gov. Mitch Daniels a charismatic leader, but he does possess some leadership skills. If he didn’t, he couldn’t have brought us this far along the happy trail to his economic Valhalla.

February 2, 2012
More Opinion Headlines

Opinion

Search Results

Discussion

When courts get involved

Site Map

Contact Us