THE ISSUE: Health care.
OUR VIEW: There has to be a better way, and it’s critical that lawmakers find it.
With Congress setting to work on a plan for universal health coverage, members of President Barack Obama’s team say they are open to a compromise.
That’s good news. The goal here should not be to adopt the president’s plan or the health insurance industry’s plan or anyone else’s plan. The goal should be to finally solve a problem that has been plaguing this country for years.
Now is our best opportunity to finally resolve this issue. All of the key players agree that it’s an issue in need of a solution. The trick will be in agreeing on that solution.
One leading possibility being put forward by moderates is a plan similar to the rural electrical cooperatives scattered across the country. The cooperatives receive government funding, but they operate independently.
A similar plan might well work for health care.
Obama addressed the American Medical Association’s annual meeting in Chicago on Monday. He told the doctors that overhaul could not wait and that bringing down health-care costs was the most important thing he could do to ensure the country’s long-term fiscal health.
That’s a strong statement, but it might well be true.
Health care costs were among the key factors that finally brought down General Motors and Chrysler. With more affordable health care, American industries could become more competitive in the global economy almost overnight.
At the same time, the health care industry is also struggling. Hospitals write off billions of dollars in health care costs every year, and yet catastrophic medical bills are the leading reason individuals find themselves filing for bankruptcy.
Meanwhile, an organization called Families USA issued a study last year claiming that nearly nine people die in Indiana every week because they don’t have health insurance.
People without health insurance generally see a physician only when they’re sick. They seldom go in for the screenings that might catch a problem early, and as a result, uninsured adults are more likely to be diagnosed with life-threatening ailments in the advanced stages, thus greatly reducing their chances for survival.
There has to be a better way, and it’s critical that lawmakers find it.
It’s good to see that the administration is open to compromise. With luck, other key players in the debate will take a similar approach.
Opinion
Compromise might be key
- Opinion
-
-
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.
Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.
-
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.
Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.
-
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.
-
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.
-
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.
-
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’
The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:
“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.
-
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.
-
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.
Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.
-
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.
-
Heinig: ‘Right-to-work’ law to arouse continued resistance
I wouldn’t call Gov. Mitch Daniels a charismatic leader, but he does possess some leadership skills. If he didn’t, he couldn’t have brought us this far along the happy trail to his economic Valhalla.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
White shouldn’t return to office








