THE ISSUE:National Newspaper Week Oct. 4-10.
OUR VIEW:Newspapers have a long future ahead as a primary source of news and information.
Newspapers can be forgiven for borrowing a line from Mark Twain: The report of our death has been greatly exaggerated.
National media coverage of the failure of a handful of major metropolitan newspapers has bred a misconception that newspapers are a dying breed. The truth is quite different.
We’re here to tell you that newspapers still deliver.
They deliver the news and the advertising that people want to help them with their daily lives, whether it’s keeping an eye out on the school board’s budget or a sale on appliances.
Every day, 2.8 million Hoosiers read a newspaper, according to research by Nielsen and SRDS Media Solutions.
That’s more Hoosier households reading a newspaper daily than watch all local TV evening newscasts, Nielsen and SRDS report.
The last readership survey performed by American Opinion Research on Hoosiers found that 87 percent of the adults read a newspaper each week, be it a daily, Sunday edition or local weekly newspaper.
It makes sense when you consider that no other source of news brings its audience so much in one easy package, whether it’s print or online. The newspaper brings reports on local government, local businesses, obituaries, crime news, high school sports coverage, church and social organization events, and advertising readers want to see. And 63 percent of Hoosiers have the newspaper delivered to their door.
It’s no wonder then that American Opinion Research found that Hoosiers overwhelmingly list newspapers as their No. 1 shopping source – easily beating out cable TV, direct mail, national TV, Internet, radio, magazines, yellow pages and billboards.
There’s no doubt that Indiana newspapers are facing challenges as they determine how to best incorporate the Internet into the delivery of local news and advertising. Newspapers that not too long ago didn’t have their own Web sites now see the Internet as a key part of their daily product.
Hoosiers tomorrow may choose to read their news on a laptop computer, iPhone or BlackBerry, but we believe they will continue to choose a newspaper as a primary source of that news.
– Hoosier State Press Association
Opinion
Newspapers still deliver
- Opinion
-
-
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.
Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.
-
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.
Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.
-
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.
-
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.
-
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.
-
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’
The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:
“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.
-
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.
-
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.
Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.
-
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.
-
Heinig: ‘Right-to-work’ law to arouse continued resistance
I wouldn’t call Gov. Mitch Daniels a charismatic leader, but he does possess some leadership skills. If he didn’t, he couldn’t have brought us this far along the happy trail to his economic Valhalla.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
White shouldn’t return to office








