THE ISSUE:Skatepark safety.
OUR VIEW:Ensure your child has the proper safety equipment and that it’s used.
Some lessons come harder than others. A day after a Logansport 14-year-old suffered a severe head injury while performing a bicycle trick at the local skate park, kids were still performing tricks without a helmet.
That’s troubling, but in many ways predictable.
It’s difficult to legislate common sense.
No matter how many rules we might pass or how many warning signs we might post, there will always be those who ignore the risks and perform these stunts without the necessary safety equipment.
It’s the nature of daredevils, we suppose. Flying through the air with your hair blowing in the breeze might be a tad more exciting for some of us.
Still, we can hope that a growing number of youngsters will begin to recognize what’s at stake.
Witnesses to the mishap at Riverside Park in Logansport say the quick actions of one young man to stop the bleeding likely saved the life of the teenager whose head struck the pavement. Saved his life.
It might be thrilling to perform these stunts, and doing so without the proper safety equipment might win you admiration in certain quarters, but a slip can clearly have devastating consequences. One moment you can be flying and the next you can be lying on the pavement with your life slipping away.
The young man in this instance was fortunate. Family members say his physicians are predicting a full recovery.
The next teenager might not be so lucky.
If your child is among those taking advantage of the Kokomo Skatepark or the one in Logansport, you should sit down and have a heart-to-heart talk. Make sure your kids have the proper safety gear, and tell them to use it.
Tell them you want to see them have fun but you also want to see them reach middle age.
– Pharos-Tribune, Logansport, and Kokomo Tribune
Opinion
Parents should lay down the law
- Opinion
-
-
Cast a vote for centers
The issue: Vote centers in Howard County.
Our view: Centers are less expensive to operate and more convenient for the average voter.
-
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.
Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.
-
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.
Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.
-
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.
-
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.
-
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.
-
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’
The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:
“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.
-
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.
-
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.
Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.
-
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Cast a vote for centers








