THE ISSUE:A discussion panel on Thursday will address the issue of adding tax caps to the state constitution.
OUR VIEW:The discussion might be of interest both to taxpayers and to elected officials.
Caston schools in Fulton this week will play host to a panel discussion on a proposal to make property tax caps part of the state constitution.
Two area lawmakers, Sen. Randy Head and Rep. Douglas Gutwein, will be among the participants. Watchdog Indiana, which can be found online at www.watchdogindiana.com, is sponsoring the event, and the moderator will be Aaron Smith, that organization’s founder.
Indiana lawmakers talked about the issue in this year’s session.
Republicans, led by Gov. Mitch Daniels, generally favored the idea, saying that it was important to lock in the property tax limits that legislators had already made a part of state law.
Democrats, led by House Speaker Patrick Bauer, generally opposed it, saying that it would be premature to pass a constitutional amendment before local units of government had a chance to figure out how the caps were affecting them.
As lawmakers return to Indianapolis next month for their biennial short session, they’ll hear from tax reform advocates seeking to lock in the tax caps they won in 2008, and they’ll hear from cities and towns who say they have been forced to make difficult budget cuts as a result of the declining tax revenues.
They might also hear from taxpayers complaining that the tax caps didn’t do enough. For some, the tax caps might have meant lower tax bills, but others might have seen their tax bills go up.
As it now stands, the tax on homeowners is limited to 1 percent of assessed value, while the tax on rentals is limited to 2 percent and the tax on businesses is limited to 3 percent.
But what of property owners whose taxes already fall below the caps? What protection would the proposed amendment provide for them?
If the Legislature approves the proposed amendment in the coming session, the measure will be the topic of a referendum in the November election.
Should lawmakers give voters that opportunity? That will be a topic of discussion at Thursday’s public meeting. Those interested in the answer might do well to attend.
— Pharos-Tribune, Logansport, and Kokomo Tribune
Opinion
Forum to address property tax caps
- Opinion
-
-
Cast a vote for centers
The issue: Vote centers in Howard County.
Our view: Centers are less expensive to operate and more convenient for the average voter.
-
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.
Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.
-
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.
Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.
-
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.
-
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.
-
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.
-
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’
The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:
“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.
-
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.
-
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.
Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.
-
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Cast a vote for centers








