THE ISSUE:Senate Republicans are pushing reforms that would take the politics out of drawing legislative and congressional districts.
OUR VIEW:Now all we need is for Democrats to join in the effort.
Republican leaders of the Indiana Senate have unveiled a package of reforms that include establishing an independent commission for drawing state legislative and congressional district boundaries.
That’s a huge step in the right direction.
All we need now is for Democrats to join the effort.
Having the support of GOP leadership means the reforms have a great chance of approval in the Senate, but the fact is that such efforts won’t go anywhere without the support of Democrats in the House.
The Senate next year will consider legislation to better define how districts should be drawn after the 2010 census. The bill calls for lawmakers to draw lines based on objective principles such as compactness, contiguity, respect for local government boundaries, preservation of communities of interest and compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
At the same time, the Senate will consider a bill to require a bipartisan look into what is and isn’t working among the redistricting efforts in other states. A special study committee would be asked to conduct hearings statewide to discuss how the people of this state can best be represented in the future.
Senate leaders also have put forward a resolution to shift future map-drawing responsibilities to an independent commission. Currently, the Indiana Constitution gives that task specifically to the General Assembly, so transferring the authority would require a constitutional amendment.
We would support such an amendment.
For far too long, the drawing of legislative and congressional districts has been an exercise aimed at gaining partisan advantage. Regardless of which party had the most votes, the goal was to draw districts in a way so as to keep the incumbents in office and make it easier for the party in control to stay in control.
The result was a large number of districts tilted heavily in favor of one party or the other, and that has left a significant percentage of legislative races uncontested in every election.
That is not the representative form of government our nation’s founders had in mind.
We welcome the move to reform this all too political process, and we call on members of both parties to put their own selfish interests aside and join the effort.
If these measures should pass, the result will almost certainly be a legislature that is more responsive to the voters. And that can’t possibly be a bad thing.
— Pharos-Tribune, Logansport, Kokomo Tribune
Opinion
Reform effort deserves support from both sides
- Opinion
-
-
Cast a vote for centers
The issue: Vote centers in Howard County.
Our view: Centers are less expensive to operate and more convenient for the average voter.
-
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.
Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.
-
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.
Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.
-
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.
-
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.
-
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.
-
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’
The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:
“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.
-
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.
-
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.
Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.
-
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Cast a vote for centers








