Tax caps need work

Opinion

Discussion

December 26, 2009

Anonymous The Kokomo Tribune Sat Dec 26, 2009, 10:39 PM EST

Indiana lawmakers next month will consider a resolution to add property tax caps to the state constitution. If the measure passes, the issue will go before voters next November.

Our hope is that lawmakers will reject the measure.

We understand the arguments on the other side. Advocates say that the tax caps approved in March 2008 resulted in the largest tax cut in Indiana history, cutting the tax bills of Indiana homeowners by an average of 30 percent.

They say the way to lock in that savings is to add tax caps to the constitution, making it more difficult for some future Legislature to wipe out the protections that are now a part of Indiana law.

Gov. Mitch Daniels points out that Hoosier property taxes are now eighth lowest in the nation. He says the median Indiana homeowner, with a house valued at $125,200, pays $844 a year in property taxes.

If those numbers are accurate, then this so-called median homeowner is currently more than $400 below the state’s much celebrated cap. With a tax cap of 1 percent on residential property, the median homeowner’s tax bill could go up by nearly 50 percent without exceeding the cap.

Where’s the protection in that?

And let’s not forget the potential increase in assessed value. There is no cap on that.

But here’s where the real unfairness comes in.

Agriculture and rental properties have a tax cap of 2 percent. Businesses have a cap of 3 percent.

Let’s take that same average Indiana house valued at $125,200. If it’s used as a rental, the house could rack up a tax bill of more than $2,500 and still be within the cap. A business with that same assessed value could have a tax bill of roughly $3,800.

Is that fair? Do apartment dwellers use twice as many government services? Should businesses really be paying three times as much as homeowners on the same assessed value?

What about farmers?

Let’s take 300 acres of farm ground valued at roughly $500,000. As a house, that amount of real estate would get a tax bill of no more than $5,000. As bare ground, the tax bill can go as high as 2 percent of the assessed value, or $10,000.

Does a field of corn really use that many more government services?

Surely, there’s a more fair way to control the rise in property taxes. We’d suggest Indiana lawmakers take another look before they lock anything in to the state constitution.

– Pharos-Tribune, Logansport, and Kokomo Tribune

Text Only | Photo Reprints

Opinion

Cast a vote for centers
The issue: Vote centers in Howard County.

Our view: Centers are less expensive to operate and more convenient for the average voter.

February 9, 2012
White shouldn’t return to office
The issue: The conviction of Indiana’s secretary of state.

Our view: Charlie White’s ouster from office should be permanent.

February 9, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 8, 2012: Grand success for Indianapolis
The issue: The Super Bowl.

Our view: Indianapolis left a great impression on thousands of visitors.

February 8, 2012
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 8, 2012
As Hoosiers celebrate the conclusion of a truly remarkable Super Bowl experience, there is even more good news that should fill us with pride. More Indiana students are graduating from high school than ever before.

February 8, 2012
Which religions will we include?
The Indiana Senate last week approved a bill that would allow public schools to teach creationism, as long as they include theories from multiple religions.

February 6, 2012 1 Photo
If you say so
In an opinion piece we published Thursday, state Rep. Mike Karickhoff announced why he voted against “right-to-work” legislation. His reason: The community told him to.

February 5, 2012
Cheers and jeers - Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
Karickhoff acted ‘cowardly’

The Rev. Robin Wentworth Mayer and Horst G. Mayer of Kokomo send the Jeer for state Rep. Mike Karickhoff’s silence during the “right-to-work” debate:

“Mr. Karickhoff, for someone who’s new to office, you’ve certainly learned the art of talking out of both sides of your mouth.

February 3, 2012
Let’s drug test our lawmakers
Perhaps it’s appropriate that a measure passed by the Indiana House this week would ask not only welfare recipients but Indiana lawmakers to consent to a drug test.

February 3, 2012
Editorial - Feb. 2, 2012: Peru delivers a message
The issue: Peru’s collection of $20,000 last year from property owners who failed to keep their yards mowed.

Our view: Aggressive enforcement can help a city’s finances, but the benefits go beyond dollars and cents.

February 2, 2012
Karickhoff: Reason behind my ‘right-to-work’ vote
There is no doubt the “right-to-work” debate has brought mixed emotions, not only to our state but District 30 as well. There were only a handful of House Republicans who did not vote in support of this legislation. Let me explain why I felt it was necessary for me to vote in opposition to right to work.

February 2, 2012
More Opinion Headlines

Opinion

Search Results

Discussion

Tax caps need work

Site Map

Contact Us