A state senator has reintroduced a measure this legislative session that asks welfare recipients in three yet-to-be-determined counties to consent to random drug tests.
The bill, sponsored by Sen. Dennis Kruse, R-Auburn, is designed to address a public perception that people on the dole are using tax dollars to support their drug habits.
Never mind that the state has no statistics to back up this assumption or that a similar program in Florida actually found just 2 percent of recipients tested positive for drugs.
And never mind that the targets of the measure might not be its only victims, that innocent children might be deprived of benefits because of a parent’s bad behavior.
The idea here is to make certain that hard-earned tax dollars aren’t going to support anyone’s destructive habits.
It’s a concept many of us can support. No one likes the image of poor people getting high on the public’s dime.
Frankly, saving individuals and families from the ravages of drug abuse is a worthy goal. If the state can accomplish that through this program, which was estimated to cost $1.1 million for a three-county pilot program during the last legislative session, it might turn out to be a good investment.
After all, if we truly can get drug-addicted welfare recipients the help they need to get their lives back on track, the result should be to reduce welfare costs and increase tax revenues.
Still, Kruse’s effort at this point is driven by perception, and given that, it might well make sense to propose these tests not only for welfare recipients but for the lawmakers themselves — just as legislators did in the last session.
That measure would’ve required legislators to consent to a test or give up privileges such as an office, a parking space or other amenities. It also would’ve given the Senate president or House speaker the authority to order a test based on reasonable suspicion that a legislator was using drugs.
The test results for lawmakers would’ve been a matter of public record, as would have the list of those who consented to a test and those who refused.
That still seems reasonable to us.
After all, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, right? Shouldn’t lawmakers who are voting to test welfare recipients be willing to undergo the same tests?
Opinion
Drug test lawmakers?
- Opinion
-
-
Scammers seek to profit
Ensure your money gets into the hands of Oklahoma residents who really need it.
-
Show flag etiquette
Fly your flag throughout the year -- and at half-staff from sunrise to noon on Memorial Day. But when you do, please treat it with respect.
-
House of Burgess: 5 arguments against impeachment
Having lost the most recent election to Barack Obama, certain foes of the president looking for another chance at regime change have decided 2016 is too far away.
-
Would you pay extra?
If Kokomo residents truly want citywide tornado sirens, they'll gladly pay a one-time fee for them.
-
Prepared for a disaster?
Put together a disaster plan and make sure everyone in your family knows what the plan is.
-
Move over, Ind. drivers
Keep highway and utility workers safe; remember to pull over for utility vehicles.
-
May 18, 2013: Cheers & Jeers
Commissioner earns respect of inmates
Kyle Stacy sends this Cheer for Howard County Commissioner Paul Wyman:
-
House of Burgess: The revolution will be printed
Another major milestone in the history of 3D printing was reached earlier this month when Cody Wilson, director of the nonprofit Defense Distributed, announced he had conducted the first-ever successful test firing of a completely 3D-printed gun in (where else?) Texas. Wilson then uploaded the plans online. These files were then downloaded over 100,000 times over the next 48 hours. That was, until the State Department intervened.
-
Hayden: From good to great in education
On the campaign trail last year and early into his administration, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence said repeatedly that his goal as governor would be to take Indiana from “good to great.”
-
Mom’s simple advice still presents a valuable challenge
Most moms don’t base their advice on scientific research. Instead, their words of wisdom come from a greater source — the heart, where they store and process life experiences. Unfortunately, some folks don’t receive the gift of maternal guidance, for various reasons.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Scammers seek to profit






